[Report Abuse]
[Login to Blog] DifrntDrmr's Blog
Opting In
The Different Drummer
Last comment by barclays 10 months ago.

Take Me To Post Comment Form

Parents should be given the right to approve their children’s participation in high stakes testing.
By Carl Petersen
____________________________________________
My neighborhood school holds a “Summer Transition Academy” for all incoming Freshmen to help them “understand the school’s expectations both academically and behaviorally.” (1) This two week program is mandatory to the point where anyone who misses more than four hours “will earn a grade of FAIL and will have to repeat STA next year…[and] THERE ARE NO PERMISSIBLE/EXCUSED TARDIES OR ABSENCES.” (2) Students who are late for school are punished with detention. It is a program that establishes itself on paper as very serious and important one for setting the proper tone for a successful high school education.

Imagine my surprise when AFTER the academy was completed I received an email informing me that all ninth grade students completed “a computer based, adaptive test that helps identify a student’s individual learning level” with questions that “are aligned to the Common Core State Standards.” Instead of receiving her first experience in front of a high school teacher, my daughter was being tested by a computer that was classifying her and providing research material for the Northwest Evaluation Association. Welcome to the new world of “reformed” education.

It has been my experience that my children are unduly stressed by the administration of high stakes tests and I, therefore, signed the appropriate “opt-out” forms last year. Had I known that testing would also be part of the summer program I would have sent my daughter with a new form. This exposes a flaw in the system. Instead of parents having to work to exempt their children from a battery of tests that they consider to be harmful, they should have to give their permission for the tests to be administered.

Under the current California state law information can be purposefully kept from parents. They have the right to “opt-out,” but no one is required to inform them of this right. Additionally, nothing can be done to facilitate the process. “The parent or guardian must initiate the request and the school district and its employees shall not solicit or encourage any written request on behalf of any child.” (3) This prohibits teachers or the district from distributing the necessary paperwork to the parents.

An opt-in system would not only guarantee that the rights of parents were respected but would also force school districts to provide proof to the community that these tests are beneficial. A study of one Eastern school district found that students spent 50 hours per school year taking required tests and assessments and another 110 hours preparing for these tests. (4) It is time for administrators to provide validation that the resources being spent on these tests is providing benefits. Administrators forced to obtain consent from parents would be placed in a position where they would have to justify their methods to the parents. This type of openness is needed to ensure that the the types of education reforms that are being implemented are actually benefiting our students.

(1) (2) http://p1cdn4static.sharpschool.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_20226865/File/Academic%20Programs/STA/STA%20Policies%20and%20Procedures%20-%20Full%20Letter.pdf
(3) http://optoutofstandardizedtests.wikispaces.com/California+CA
(4) http://www.aft.org/newspubs/news/2013/072313testing.cfm


Latest Activity: Feb 02, 2016 at 4:23 PM



Blog has been viewed (1045) times.

tealcokegirl commented on Monday, Aug 18, 2014 at 22:58 PM

what a crazy "opt" option, what are they doing preparing the incoming kids to get used to the bullying?

barclays commented on Tuesday, Feb 02, 2016 at 16:23 PM

I’m Bryan Roland by name, i want to use this medium to alert all loan seekers to be very careful because there are scammers everywhere.Few months ago I was financially strained, and due to my desperation I was scammed by several online lenders. I had almost lost hope until a friend of mine referred me to a very reliable lender called Mr Roy Smith ( A God fearing man) who lend me a loan of $45,000 under 72 working hours without any stress. I explain to the company by mail and all they told me was to cry no more because i will get my loan in their company and also i have made the right choice of contacting them i filled the loan application form and proceeded with all that was requested of me and to my shock I was given the loan, If you are in need of any kind of loan just contact him now via: barclaysloanservice247@yahoo.com, I‘m using this medium to alert all loan seekers because of the hell I passed through in the hands of those fraudulent lenders.

Thanks you Barclays Loan service for your help.


Log In to post comments.

Previous blog entries by DifrntDrmr
 
#BLACKLIVESMATTER
July 10, 2016
“And let’s get a couple things straight, just a little sidenote – the burden of the brutalized is not to comfort the bystander.That’s not our job, alright – stop with all that. If you have a critique for the resistance, for our resistance, then you better have an established record ...
Read More »
 
#?@$ Chi Minh Provides an Example of Censorship in
May 07, 2016
As a child the first thing I did when presented with a new dictionary was check for the swear words. I already knew what they meant, but their presence validated the authenticity of the reference; if I could be trusted to know that these words existed, then surely the rest ...
Read More »
 
Trump the Alpha Male?
March 18, 2016
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” [1] -First Amendment - United ...
Read More »
 
Exercising The Mandate
February 20, 2016
“The President...shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ...judges of the Supreme Court” [1] -United States Constitution Antonin Scalia’s body was barely cold before Republican politicians began angling to prevent President Obama from selecting his successor. Taking the lead, Senate Majority Leader ...
Read More »
 
Out of Smell, Out of Mind
February 02, 2016
“Witnesses cannot ask questions of the parties, lawyers or the Hearing Board” -South Coast AQMD Hearing Board A good way of determining how long someone has lived in my neighborhood is to ask them which “city” they live in. Long time residents will state that we are in Northridge, which, ...
Read More »
 
[View More Blogs...]





 
Powered by
Morris Technology